Dontyouremember

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 3 April 2013

Could North Korea's madness lead to a U.S.-China nuclear war?

Posted on 22:21 by Unknown
Until now, I've not paid much heed to Kim Jong-Un's recent displays of animus against the United States. To my eyes, he was simply playing to the domestic audience. We're talking about a doughy, chain-smoking, easily-peeved, puerile brat trying to establish himself as a Really Tough Dude. The kid is simply ridiculous.

But now his regime has officially announced approval for nuclear strikes on the United States. This kind of rhetoric goes way beyond anything one would expect from a poseur like Kim...
North Korea dramatically escalated its warlike rhetoric on Thursday, warning that it had authorised plans for nuclear strikes on targets in the United States.

"The moment of explosion is approaching fast," the North Korean military said, warning that war could break out "today or tomorrow".
I was under the impression that the North Koreans had not yet developed missiles capable of reaching North America. Has that situation changed? (Apparently, this new missile can reach Guam.)

Conceivably, all of this nuclear sabre-rattling is designed to stave off defections in the North Korean military.
Defense analysts say that there are indeed some hints that Kim may be losing his hold on the military.

There have been defections of small units of North Korean soldiers to China – soldiers who were subsequently turned around and sent back to North Korea, says retired Brig. Gen. Russell Howard, former commander of the 1st Special Forces Group, which has an Asia Focus.

This may seem like a positive development, but it is a problem because it means that Kim may feel the need to reassert his control over the military, by beating the war drum and trying to get his troops to rally around it. The more he needs their support, the harder he might beat the drum.
“It seems that a more aggressive clique now has influence over Kim,” Howard says.

Indeed, plenty of questions remains about just what Kim’s relationship is to the military, says Victor Cha, director of Asian Studies at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.

“Is he in control, is he not in control? There are so many unknowns here,” Mr. Cha says.

“We don’t know how he views the world, we don’t know how he views the credibility of his own nuclear arsenal, whether he views the US and South Korea as paper tigers – we know none of these things.”
Has this young man has become totally delusional? Is he like Hitler in the bunker, planning architectural monuments while Berlin burns?

A few days ago, the Daily Beast published a piece which offered a deeper look at the power struggles within the North Korean establishment. The drama is a simple one: Young Master Kim came to power before he could install (or curry favor with) loyalists in key military posts. As a result, his position is more tenuous than was his father's.

His inner inner circle really comes down to two figures: An aunt, Kim Kyong-hui, and her husband, Jang Sung-taek. The key figure is Jang, a four-star general born in 1947. He has been completely reshaping the power structure put in place by Kim Jong-Un's father.
Moreover, Kim and Jang have sacked top flag officers, most notably Vice Marshal Ri Yong-ho, the respected chief of the general staff. Some analysts believe there was a shootout between forces opposing Ri and those loyal to him when he was deposed last July. Whether or not these rumors are true, it has become clear that Kim’s removal of the popular Ri did not sit well with frontline commanders. In a further sign of turmoil, Ri’s successor, Hyon Yong-chol, was subsequently demoted.

Kim Jong-un may have gone too far in upsetting the top brass, so much of his strident rhetoric today appears to be an attempt to appease old-guard generals and admirals. Kim and Jang may be the most powerful individuals in Pyongyang, but they are not in control of the military, and they have not consolidated power over other regime elements. As a result of the disarray, the hardliners seem to have grabbed control.
Reportedly, an assassination attempt occurred around the time of that firefight.

Can't China restrain these guys?
China’s flag officers have maintained links with their North Korean counterparts and still hold pro-Pyongyang views. The Chinese military, for instance, has transferred at least six mobile missile launchers for the North’s new KN-08 nuclear-capable missile, thereby substantially increasing Kim’s ability to wage nuclear war. So instead of restraining their belligerent allies, the Chinese seem to be egging them on.
Oh.

Are these guys serious? Any attack against the United States or its interests would lead to the annihilation of North Korea. Perhaps Kim doesn't mind that outcome. Or perhaps he cannot understand the consequences. Perhaps he cannot understand the limits of his ability to control events. Perhaps reality isn't really real to him.

Would China go in with North Korea on nuclear war? Remember, World War I started with an assassination in Bosnia.

Ominously enough, Chinese military figures have hinted at their own nuclear threats. Just last month, Maj. Gen. Zhu Chenghu visited Washington. This same General is best-known for issuing a let's-go-nuclear statement in 2005:
“If the Americans draw their missiles and position [sic]-guided ammunition onto the target zone on China’s territory, I think we will have to respond with nuclear weapons,” Zhu told reporters for the Financial Times and the Asian edition of the Wall Street Journal, according to their July 14, 2005, editions.

The comments raised questions within the Pentagon about the sincerity of China’s policy of not being the first to use nuclear weapons in a conflict.

Zhu’s comments also were the most explicit statement of Chinese strategic intent since 1995 when another general, Xiong Guangkai, implicitly threatened to use nuclear arms against Los Angeles if the United States defended Taiwan in a conflict.
Defending North Korea and defending Chinese territory are two different things. Still, North Korea is a Chinese ally, and it's hard to imagine that the Chinese would simply sit back and shrug their shoulders while the United States and/or South Korea transform pockets of North Korea into ashes. Even an attack by conventional forces on Chinese interests could escalate into a nuclear response -- indeed, that was the very point Zhu wanted to hammer home.
Zhu’s comments called into question the stated Chinese policy of not being the first nation to use nuclear weapons in a conflict. Zhu said the no-first-use policy did not apply to nuclear-armed states. He said the policy was limited to nonnuclear states and could be changed.

The Pentagon’s 2012 report to Congress on China’s military stated, “There has been no clarification of the ambiguity regarding the conditions under which China’s [no-first-use] policy might not apply or where conditional nuclear threats might be permissible.”

The 2011 annual report said it is possible that China’s military considers “demonstration [nuclear] strikes, or high altitude [nuclear] bursts” as permissible under its doctrine. It also said it is unclear whether Chinese doctrine allows the use of nuclear weapons in response to a conventional strike that threatened its nuclear forces or the communist regime, as Zhu stated in 2005.
It remains unclear whether China has formally renounced its once-sacrosanct no-first-use policy. It also remains unclear whether China would risk a nuclear counterattack by defending an allied nation run by a petulant boy whom most people -- even most Chinese -- don't seem to like.

Although China has been expanding its nuclear arsenal, they would be drastically outgunned in any nuclear exchange. Here's the most recent information I could find:
The United States has 18 times more nuclear warheads than Chinese (7,295 compared to 400). The entire Chinese nuclear arsenal packs about as much firepower as the nuclear weapons on one American trident submarine. The United States has 982 missile with multiple nuclear warheads that can reach China. China has 32 missiles that can reach the United States.
I refuse to believe that Kim's madness will trigger such a planetary catastrophe. Undoubtedly, cooler heads in Beijing are quietly seeking ways to leash the brat. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that the Chinese are mulling over quiet methods of bringing about regime change in Pyongyang.

All of that said, Kim's recent threats are simply...extraordinary.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • More Syrian weirdness
    This post is a follow-up to the one below. Although most Americans aren't paying much attention to the Syrian rebellion, that situation ...
  • Has Uncle Sam partnered up with Al Qaeda?
    According to the NYT, a message from Al Qaeda is the reason why so many embassies went on alert: The United States intercepted electronic c...
  • EPIC news!
    This is interesting. A privacy group called The Electronic Privacy Information Center wants to bring suit against the NSA over, basically, ...
  • News
    Everyone is talking about Jeff Bezo's purchase of the Washington Post. I don't think this decision will be as "culturally catac...
  • Bout steak
    The horsemeat-sold-as-beef scandal took a parapolitical turn recently, when it was revealed that the mastermind may be the notorious Viktor ...
  • Weird connections galore!
    The more you look into the background of the people behind the inflammatory pseudo-film "Innocence of Muslims," the stranger they ...
  • Ghost radar!
    I'm sick of writing NSA stories and you're sick of reading them. So right now, I'd like to talk about something that happened as...
  • Ending privacy? There's an app for that!
    I may have mentioned this before, but: You know that when folding money gets old, it is sent to an official location for disposal, right? We...
  • The Romney campaign is getting weird in these final days
    Am I the only person to notice that Team Romney is acting in an unfathomable fashion as election day approaches? Money should be tight right...
  • AP spying: Were other news journals targeted too?
    Not much time to write, but I did want to mention the one real Obama administration scandal to emerge in recent days. Benghazi and the IRS ...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (314)
    • ►  August (11)
    • ►  July (45)
    • ►  June (40)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ▼  April (54)
      • My home town (Plus: Am I a racist for noticing thi...
      • Was Dubya dumb?
      • The Wall Street Journal vs. capitalism (Added note)
      • The final (for now) word on Boston
      • Louie, Louie...
      • "Al Qaeda elements located in Iran"
      • "Audiences don't know somebody sits down and write...
      • Debunking Alex Jones
      • Was Misha "nash"?
      • Meanwhile, the big banks have robbed us all...again
      • WMDs in Boston -- or: Who killed Sean Collier? (Up...
      • How to make a fortune short-selling
      • Terror, murder, and Conspiracy Inc.
      • If Tamerlan Tsarnaev had read this blog, he'd stil...
      • Joseph Cannon's day off
      • Who was that naked guy?
      • The most sublime moment in the history of Fox News
      • Did Watertown's top cop tell a big, big lie?
      • I call "bullshit" on this one
      • WHICH foreign country?
      • At least there won't be a war
      • They got him
      • The terrorist's tweets
      • Chechens
      • Hell breaks loose
      • Photo ID update. Plus: Libertarianism kills Texans
      • Now I'm worried (2 updates)
      • The Boston bombing: An arrest...?
      • The Ricin attacker claimed to have uncovered a sch...
      • Can the smoke tell us about the perp?
      • Were bomb-sniffing dogs on the scene BEFORE the ex...
      • Whodunnit
      • Sick, sicker, sickest...
      • The explosions
      • Why North Korea should be taken seriously
      • Who bombed Pearl Harbor?
      • Porn dead
      • "Some feel..."
      • The PC is not dead
      • North Korean nuke missiles CAN reach us
      • It just hit me
      • The one promise Obama kept
      • The world has truly gone mad
      • Mitch and the mic
      • Nil nisi bonum
      • North Korea: Another means of unconventional attack
      • North Korean nukes: A follow-up
      • Does North Korea have a portable nuclear weapon?
      • Social Security and the submissive void
      • Fade
      • Could North Korea's madness lead to a U.S.-China n...
      • Madness reigneth
      • The great conspiracy theory poll
      • If your bank fails, will YOU be held responsible? ...
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (34)
    • ►  January (57)
  • ►  2012 (186)
    • ►  December (37)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (47)
    • ►  September (61)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile