Dontyouremember

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 14 January 2013

What's it going to be: Social Security or Defense? (Updated)

Posted on 01:28 by Unknown
Update: As I write these words, Obama is giving a news conference on the debt ceiling. He is saying many of the right things, but he refuses to state outright that cuts to Social Security and Medicare are off the table. Given the man's slippery language in the past, I hope some reporter compels Obama to be (as a previous president might have put it) perfectly clear.

I also hope that public pressure can force him to address raising the Social Security cap and allowing Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices. These are easy solutions that will not make life difficult for the most vulnerable among us.

And now, back to our original post...

*  *  *

The House is preparing to shut down the government in order to force Obama to cut "spending." That means they're coming for your Social Security.
The idea of allowing the country to default by refusing to increase the debt limit is getting more widespread and serious traction among House Republicans than people realize, though GOP leaders think shutting down the government is the much more likely outcome of the spending fights this winter.
Unfortunately, we're not talking about a mere temporary shutdown, which would be grim but endurable (and, in the end, helpful to Dems). The debt ceiling is a different animal. Although the debt itself -- that is, interest owed on money already borrowed -- will continue to be paid, interest rates will rise and stock markets around the world may crater if we default on our other obligations.

That's the apocalyptic shock the Republicans want, in order to force an end to Social Security and Medicare.

That's the Republican goal, and never forget it.

That's the reason why we're seeing stories like this one, which exist to soften up the average citizen's psychology. They want you to believe that the "entitlement era" is coming to an end due to one of those grand, miasmic historical movements that have neither form nor origin point. So just shrug your shoulders and say whatcha gonna do? -- and for God's sake, don't blame Social Security's demise on right-wing ideologues, on actual people with names and addresses who have been working tirelessly to dismantle the system.

The Republicans have all the advantages, now that Obama has nixed the trillion dollar coin idea.
In his own proposed budget for 2013, Obama proposed deep cuts in domestic spending, even without this deal. In Obama's own budget, discretionary domestic would fall from 5.8 percent in 2009 to 3.1 percent in 2011 and just 1.8 percent in 2018. He proposes to spend less on education than George W. Bush did. And this is just the starting point from which Republicans will demand further cuts.
Try telling those facts to the next Republican who blathers on about how this president is a huge spender. Then again, don't bother. Unwelcome facts do not penetrate the conservative cranium.

In my view, now is the time to push for these goals:

1. We can solve the Social Security "crisis" painlessly by raising the cap. Obama, to his credit, has discussed this option. Obama, to his discredit, did not mention this option when it counted, during the fiscal cliff drama.

2. We can cut Medicare costs by allowing for the negotiation of drug discounts. Candidate Obama liked the idea; President Obama never talks about it. (Al Franken introduced such a bill in the Senate.)

3. We can return to the era of taxing stock trading. A tiny tax on all trades will add up to big numbers, and will have the added benefit of reducing computer-driven mischief. The Wall Street Journal hates the idea, which is the best possible argument in its favor.

4. We can return the Defense budget to the pre-9/11 levels. The graphs below (both from Wikipedia) tell the story.



When pundits decry our deficit, why do they never point to the obvious culprit? Returning our military to Clinton-era levels -- levels which, at the time, liberals considered bloated -- would reduce the budget by $4 trillion dollars over a decade, and would still keep us well ahead of all other nations.

The great un-discussed scandal of the Obama era is the rise in military spending even as the wars have wound down. Look again at the upper chart. Instead of telling Grandma to polish her resume, wouldn't you rather lop off the blue and red parts of those upright bars?
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • More Syrian weirdness
    This post is a follow-up to the one below. Although most Americans aren't paying much attention to the Syrian rebellion, that situation ...
  • News
    Everyone is talking about Jeff Bezo's purchase of the Washington Post. I don't think this decision will be as "culturally catac...
  • Weird connections galore!
    The more you look into the background of the people behind the inflammatory pseudo-film "Innocence of Muslims," the stranger they ...
  • Ghost radar!
    I'm sick of writing NSA stories and you're sick of reading them. So right now, I'd like to talk about something that happened as...
  • Ending privacy? There's an app for that!
    I may have mentioned this before, but: You know that when folding money gets old, it is sent to an official location for disposal, right? We...
  • EPIC news!
    This is interesting. A privacy group called The Electronic Privacy Information Center wants to bring suit against the NSA over, basically, ...
  • Has Uncle Sam partnered up with Al Qaeda?
    According to the NYT, a message from Al Qaeda is the reason why so many embassies went on alert: The United States intercepted electronic c...
  • America is under the SOD (and other NSA stories)
    Y'know, I really really really REALLY would prefer to address any topic other than the NSA right now. But that topic is Not So Avoidabl...
  • Anything you say can and will be used against you
    You'd have to be dense as concrete not to understand the unsettling implications of this NYT story ... The N.S.A. is not just intercepti...
  • The Romney campaign is getting weird in these final days
    Am I the only person to notice that Team Romney is acting in an unfathomable fashion as election day approaches? Money should be tight right...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (314)
    • ►  August (11)
    • ►  July (45)
    • ►  June (40)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (54)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (34)
    • ▼  January (57)
      • Cops
      • How black was my helicopter
      • Non sequitur of the day: "Second Amendment!"
      • A voting rights amendment
      • "Blood libel"
      • David Brooks' advice to Republicans
      • "The Untold History of the United States"
      • The plot against Aaron Swartz
      • Which conspiracy theories have merit? Which are no...
      • Notes...
      • Women in combat
      • The Untouchables
      • The best conspiracy theory I've seen all day
      • Hillary, Benghazi and the Johnson Unit
      • Zero Dark Thirty and the Al Qaeda mysteries
      • A story about guns
      • Obama's inaugural poem (updated)
      • "If someone says we have to talk peace, he’s consi...
      • The Second Amendment isn't in danger -- it's all t...
      • The Sandy Hook Pseudotruthers
      • Tyranny...?
      • Follow-up post on the Awlaki mystery
      • The inevitable follow-up post on guns (with an add...
      • What Aaron Swartz actually did
      • The inevitable gun control post
      • Is there a hidden side to the Swartz story?
      • Mickey Mouse killed Aaron Swartz
      • Atrios gets it right
      • Okay, this is weird...
      • What's it going to be: Social Security or Defense?...
      • Psy War
      • No coin
      • RFK Jr. on the murder of his uncle
      • School prayer: The devil really IS in the details
      • Noteworthy...
      • Red State Hell
      • "BAM! I cannot believe how idiot these people are!"
      • Can we use The Coin to pay Atlas to shrug?
      • Laptop vs. tablet
      • Noted...
      • Brother, can you spare a trillion-dollar coin?
      • Aw, shoot
      • I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed this (up...
      • A little advice
      • Austerity won't work
      • The Awlaki mystery: Was he one of ours? Is he real...
      • FBI abets plot to assassinate Occupy leaders
      • "Terrorists and pedophiles and cannibals -- oh my!"
      • Ah, 1966!
      • I've been waiting decades for this one...
      • Some conspiracies are open
      • King's speech
      • Still more cliff notes
      • Let's focus on what's really important
      • What...?
      • 2016: It's over, baby
      • A look back at stuff
  • ►  2012 (186)
    • ►  December (37)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (47)
    • ►  September (61)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile