Dontyouremember

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, 25 June 2013

The Supreme Court embraces the "voter fraud" myth

Posted on 19:58 by Unknown
While it's useful to see the Supreme Court's heinous decision in terms of America's history of racial discrimination, it is even more useful to see it in terms of the GOP's ongoing efforts to use the "voter fraud" myth as a means of suppressing the Democratic vote.
Who loses today? Not just the tens of millions of minority voters whose ability to cast a ballot now may be more easily restricted by new voting laws. Not just the millions who now will be more vulnerable to redistricting plans that are patently discriminatory. But the poor, the elderly, and the ill of all races, men and women who have voted lawfully for years but who will not be able to find the money to pay for new identification cards, or take the time out of work to travel to state offices to get one, or have the health to make the journey to obtain identification they otherwise do not need. These people, everywhere, were the indirect beneficiaries of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. And today their right to vote is far less secure.*

So the losers today are registered voters like Craig Debose, a Vietnam veteran and longtime resident of South Carolina. Last year, he traveled 11 hours by train to Washington to testify in a Section 5 lawsuit. He doesn't have a car, which is why he didn't have photo identification, which is why he was going to be disenfranchised by state lawmakers until the Voting Rights Act saved him (for at least the last election cycle, the South Carolina law is still on the books). Losing today, too, is Jacqueline Kane, an elderly woman in Pennsylvania who had voted lawfully without incident for decades but who would have been forced from her nursing home to get an identification card. All to prevent "voter fraud" no one can prove.
Voter ID laws will now immediately go into effect in Texas, which -- as you may not know -- has been inching away from the red zone. I would go so far as to say that immediate impetus for this decision may have been a desire to keep Texas out of the blue.

The Court's decision gives the "go" signal to racially biased gerrymandering. Not long ago, there was an attempt in one Texas county to place all the Latino voters in one district in order to dilute their strength in neighboring districts. Expect to see much of that sort of trickery.

Here are my three main takeaways from this rotten decision:

1. Those purer-than-pure lefties who claim to see no difference between the parties are fools. (This blog seems to attract more than its share of people who think this way.) If no substantive difference exists, then the voting suppression tactics discussed above would serve no purpose, and the Justices who voted for today's decision would not all have been chosen by Republican presidents.

2. The GOP is doubling down on the Nixonian Southern strategy. I both agree and disagree with Joshua Green of Bloomberg:
On its face, this looks like a big victory for Republicans. But is it really? I suspect it will turn out to be a poisoned chalice. Many of the GOP’s current problems stem from the fact that it is overly beholden to its white, Southern base at a time when the country is rapidly becoming more racially diverse. In order to expand its base of power beyond the House of Representatives, the GOP needs to expand its appeal to minority voters. As the ongoing battle over immigration reform demonstrates, that process is going poorly and looks like it will be very difficult.
I agree that this decision will serve to prolong the GOP's image as the party of racism. I disagree with the "poisoned chalice" remark. Both the party and the nation will acclimate itself to this toxin.

The Republicans have been pushing the "voter fraud" myth very hard since at least 2004. They would not propagate the fable if they did not have polls and other data telling them that voter ID laws work to their advantage.

3. The ultimate targets of the disenfranchisement movement are not blacks and Latinos but the homeless, the jobless and the disaffected. Even desperate people who find lodgings with relatives may suddenly find themselves unable to pay student loans or the IRS. Such people probably number in the millions. They will not want to divulge their addresses to the compilers of any official database, which is precisely what voter ID laws demand.

The modern economy is creating a growing lumpenproletariat. Even people with jobs -- even college teachers -- now find themselves living in cars, shelters and public parks. Another economic shock could cause the number of desperately poor people to skyrocket. Voter ID laws will grant these economic victims no way to exact political punishment on the corrupt officeholders who ruined their lives.

Barred from the voting booth, the very poor will have no outlet but rebellion. And as you know, there are plans in place for that contingency as well. A big part of that planning is the development of non-lethal weaponry. An even bigger part is our hideously oppressive domestic surveillance infrastructure.

Which once again brings us, by a commodius vicus of recirculation, back to Ed Snowden and Environs...
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • More Syrian weirdness
    This post is a follow-up to the one below. Although most Americans aren't paying much attention to the Syrian rebellion, that situation ...
  • Has Uncle Sam partnered up with Al Qaeda?
    According to the NYT, a message from Al Qaeda is the reason why so many embassies went on alert: The United States intercepted electronic c...
  • EPIC news!
    This is interesting. A privacy group called The Electronic Privacy Information Center wants to bring suit against the NSA over, basically, ...
  • News
    Everyone is talking about Jeff Bezo's purchase of the Washington Post. I don't think this decision will be as "culturally catac...
  • Bout steak
    The horsemeat-sold-as-beef scandal took a parapolitical turn recently, when it was revealed that the mastermind may be the notorious Viktor ...
  • Weird connections galore!
    The more you look into the background of the people behind the inflammatory pseudo-film "Innocence of Muslims," the stranger they ...
  • Ghost radar!
    I'm sick of writing NSA stories and you're sick of reading them. So right now, I'd like to talk about something that happened as...
  • Ending privacy? There's an app for that!
    I may have mentioned this before, but: You know that when folding money gets old, it is sent to an official location for disposal, right? We...
  • The Romney campaign is getting weird in these final days
    Am I the only person to notice that Team Romney is acting in an unfathomable fashion as election day approaches? Money should be tight right...
  • AP spying: Were other news journals targeted too?
    Not much time to write, but I did want to mention the one real Obama administration scandal to emerge in recent days. Benghazi and the IRS ...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (314)
    • ►  August (11)
    • ►  July (45)
    • ▼  June (40)
      • The Hypersexualization of Everything
      • Debt slavery
      • The messenger, and how to shoot him
      • Old soldiers never die. They just...listen in.
      • Arianna, your roots are showing
      • The Supreme Court embraces the "voter fraud" myth
      • Marian: "You speak treason!" Robin: "Fluently."
      • Spook
      • The REAL story
      • Endgame: The death of Michael Hastings
      • Did the NSA spy on Barack Obama?
      • "Nobody is listening to your phone calls": Oh REAL...
      • Sick think and Ed Snowden
      • World's scariest video
      • Obama arouses Ayres
      • The weird and wonderful world of Ed Snowden
      • Space
      • Two questions
      • GAY BDSM PORN AT THE CIA!
      • Nothing to hide
      • Orwell cackles
      • NSAaaaaaaAAARRRRGH!!!!
      • Hey, Ed...let ME have a crack at it!
      • How do you solve a problem like MARINA?
      • A scene from my home...
      • Top ten ways to smear Ed Snowden
      • Proof that Snowden's a good guy
      • Call me naive...
      • Quick NSA note
      • GOT
      • Hard reality
      • The Prism documents: Are they "Rather" deceptive?
      • PRISM and the plot AGAINST Obama
      • NSA spying on your phone records: Here's the part ...
      • The telltale corpse
      • "Don’t you remember what happened to Martin Luther...
      • Around and about...
      • A further thought on a mysterious shooting
      • The strange death of Ibragim Todashev (Updated)
      • Shot in the back of the head
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (54)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (34)
    • ►  January (57)
  • ►  2012 (186)
    • ►  December (37)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (47)
    • ►  September (61)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile